- The Exponential Blueprint
- Posts
- 83% of Investors Now Ask This Question Before Funding You
83% of Investors Now Ask This Question Before Funding You
The $405M Mistake Most Founders Make Without Realizing
Former Zillow exec targets $1.3T
The top companies target big markets. Like Nvidia growing ~200% in 2024 on AI’s $214B tailwind. That’s why the same VCs behind Uber and Venmo also backed Pacaso. Created by a former Zillow exec, Pacaso’s co-ownership tech transforms a $1.3 trillion market. With $110M+ in gross profit to date, Pacaso just reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.
Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.


From Cost Center to Valuation Engine: The Untold Power of Supply Chains
Dear Founder,
A huge thank you to the 22,000+ founders, investors, and C-suite executives who read The Exponential Blueprint each week.
You know this by now:
We don’t deliver information.
We deliver transformation.
This week’s edition tackles one of the most misunderstood drivers of business valuation: your supply chain.
Most founders treat it like a cost. But research—and experience—shows it’s a valuation multiplier when properly aligned with IP and capital efficiency.
Since 2017: The CFO Program That Helps Founders Scale with Confidence
Back in 2017, I started helping founders build businesses that investors don’t just fund—they fight for.
That became the Exponential CFO Program. Now inside the Blueprint, it includes:
20 strategic video modules (IP, pricing, cash flow, scaling, valuation)
A full-year execution roadmap
Boardroom-grade financial tools
Founder-proof language. CFO-level transformation.
If you want a capital-efficient, investor-ready business…
Book your access today. Limited availability.

Let’s Start with a $100M Difference
Two businesses. Same industry. Same revenue. Same market.
Company | Revenue | EBITDA Margin | Valuation Multiple | Valuation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Business A | $30M | 9% | 6x | $162M |
Business B | $30M | 21% | 9x | $567M |
What’s the difference?
🔍 McKinsey (2022) found that companies with resilient, digitized supply chains earned a 15–25% valuation premium over peers.
Business B aligned its supply chain with IP, ESG principles, and smart financing.
Business A did not.
Below is a YouTube video with Private Market Expert, James Hunt, who reveals to us
THE CITY OF LONDON’S BEST KEPT MONEY SECRETS
In September 2025, there will be 5 YouTube premieres dedicated to PISCES, the intermittent trading system that will revolutionise private share trading.
This short video is part of the 5 YouTube episodes.
1. Valuation Is No Longer About Revenue—It’s About Operational Control
Positive Case
A leading D2C skincare brand implemented AI-based forecasting and nearshored production. This slashed lead times by 60%, grew margins by 18%, and enabled a 12x exit multiple.
Negative Case
A hardware-SaaS company outsourced production to Asia without redundancies. When global shipping froze, they missed delivery windows. Despite product demand, VCs pulled term sheets.
Research Insight:
BCG notes that supply chain digitization can increase EBITDA by 15–20% through margin optimization, agility, and working capital control.
2. IP Alone Doesn’t Make You Rich—IP + Supply Chain Does
Positive Case
A biotech firm patented a novel probiotic strain. Instead of licensing it, it built its own GMP-certified facility, boosting margins from 42% to 79%. It was acquired at a 9-figure valuation.
Negative Case
An AgriTech business patented a sensor but outsourced manufacturing. IP was leaked, and within months, a competitor launched a near-identical product.
Harvard Business Review (2021) found that IP-rich companies without aligned operations had 2.3x lower profitability than those with vertically coordinated fulfillment strategies.
3. You Don’t Have to Own—You Have to Control
Positive Case
A European fashion-tech brand partnered with 18 independent ateliers. By using shared KPIs, blockchain tracking, and strict SOPs, it scaled to 30 countries without capex.
Negative Case
A sustainable packaging startup raised capital to build their own facilities. Costs ballooned, supply bottlenecks emerged, and growth flatlined. Capex had outpaced revenue.
Bain & Co. (2023): Asset-light companies using platform supply chains scale 2x faster and attract better capital efficiency multiples.
Gartner (2023): 65% of high-growth SMEs now use ecosystem partnerships over vertical integration.
4. Supply Chains Are Now ESG Gatekeepers
Positive Case
A reusable packaging startup implemented traceability and lifecycle CO₂ metrics across their supply chain. They secured an ESG fund from BlackRock and a major supermarket listing.
Negative Case
An “eco” food brand unknowingly sourced palm oil from illegal farms. When exposed, investors fled, retailers pulled them, and their brand collapsed overnight.
PwC (2023): 83% of institutional investors now review Scope 3 supply chain emissions before investing. ESG supply chain governance is no longer optional—it’s a requirement.
5. Cash Flow Comes from Operational Agility, Not Just Sales
Positive Case
A B2B electronics company adopted supply chain financing, extending payables and shortening inventory cycles. Free cash flow improved by 30%, enabling an equity-efficient expansion.
Negative Case
An e-commerce startup with strong sales found itself insolvent—why? Cash was trapped in inventory, and they lacked supplier credit terms. They raised a down round at a 40% lower valuation.
McKinsey: Optimizing working capital via supply chain actions (inventory, payables) is the fastest path to higher cash flow yield and investor attractiveness.
Final Word: Valuation = IP × Supply Chain × Execution
Think about it:
Your IP creates uniqueness.
Your supply chain protects and monetizes it.
Your cash flow strategy unlocks scale without dilution.
When these three align, you don’t just build a company.
You build a valuation machine.
PROTECT AND PROFIT : HOW TO BUILD YOUR MOAT
Below is a YouTube Video with Jim Joyce, IP Superpower
Below is a YouTube video with Sam Palazzolo, US Investment Banker.
Learn about “The Shocking Financial Mistake CEOs Make When Scaling Up”
M&A : The Expert Corner, From Indonesia
It's no myth—M&A timelines in Asia are often longer than in Western markets, particularly for smaller or family-owned businesses. This is driven by several factors, including cultural nuances, data accessibility, and accounting harmonization.
Building a strong relationship with the seller is paramount. The process often extends beyond standard business negotiations, as sellers are sharing crucial information about a business that may be a core part of their family legacy. This requires a deeper understanding of cultural traditions, including the importance of religious festivities, which can directly impact deal-making schedules. Hierarchical structures and the involvement of multiple partners can further extend the timeline. I have personally experienced deal delays due to religious holidays, which highlights the importance of cultural awareness in aligning expectations.
These longer timelines do not make Asian acquisitions less attractive, but they must be carefully factored into your strategic planning.
Need support to acquire a strategic bolt-on in Asia? Contact us to navigate the unique complexities of the market and ensure a successful acquisition.
Marguerite Bolze
Below is our full podcast with Marguerite Bolze
Thank you again for being part of this mission.
Let’s stop managing spreadsheets—and start building equity.
How did you like today’s Newsletter? |
Matteo Turi
Chief Financial Officer | The Exponential Blueprint
Reply